<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Do My Eyes Look Scary? &#187; cycling74</title>
	<atom:link href="http://music.cornwarning.com/tag/cycling74/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://music.cornwarning.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective on Cycling74 dropping Pluggo support&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/05/15/perspective-on-cycling74-dropping-pluggo-support/</link>
		<comments>http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/05/15/perspective-on-cycling74-dropping-pluggo-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chaircrusher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ableton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling74]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://music.cornwarning.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This started out as a comment on This CDM post but grew to the point I moved it here. Peter Kirn took this announcement as an opportunity to discuss free/open alternatives, which is great, but personally, I&#8217;ve really come to &#8230; <a href="http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/05/15/perspective-on-cycling74-dropping-pluggo-support/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="alignright"><g:plusone href="http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/05/15/perspective-on-cycling74-dropping-pluggo-support/" size="standard" count="true"></g:plusone></div><p>This started out as a comment on <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/15/cycling-74-ditches-plug-in-development-support-free-commercial-alternatives/">This CDM post</a> but grew to the point I moved it here.  Peter Kirn took this announcement as an opportunity to discuss free/open alternatives, which is great, but personally, I&#8217;ve really come to value the increased quality of software made by people who do it commercially over the myriad sketchy and semi-sketchy free alternatives.  I&#8217;d sooner stab my nuts with a rusty fork than try and do anything with Pd&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Full disclosure, I&#8217;m friends with a couple of the Cycling74 guys&#8230;<br />
</em><br />
Like a lot of decisions at Cycling74, what drives decision-making is the fact that they&#8217;re a small company &#8212; vanishingly small compared to e.g. Ableton.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t know the mind of Zicarreli, the actions of Cycling 74 over the years speak volumes:  The company has stayed tiny as a conscious decision, and has only added new people when they find someone whose talents are unique and there is a good fit with respect to personality and philosophy.</p>
<p>Since Cycling74 is vanishingly small, they have to be very careful about what they say &#8216;yes&#8217; to and they will say &#8216;no&#8217; a lot.  I surmise the whole partnership with Cycling74 came about because of personal contact, friendship, and shared vision between principles at the two companies.</p>
<p>Having said &#8216;yes&#8217; to Ableton, Cycling74 is going to increase their customer base by a couple of orders of magnitude, and supporting this new base is going to be a challenge. Luckily Ableton has the larger staff and deeper pockets to share that burden.</p>
<p>Not continuing to support VST and AU and RTAS might be sad for those of us who bought those products, but it&#8217;s a completely understandable business decision.</p>
<p>Let it be said also, that while I love Pluggo and Hipno, they&#8217;re not what I&#8217;d call smooth or easy to use in VST hosts, for a load of reasons. The Max/Live integration might be closed source and a software monoculture but it will do a couple of really useful changes for musicians:</p>
<ul>
<li>Live is really good at timing, and is a straightforward sequencing environment.  Max? Not so much.</li>
<li>Max will become part of a software ecosystem that &#8212; all bitching on the Ableton Forums aside &#8212; has considerable human resources devoted to quality control. Combine that with the much larger user base, Max will benefit in terms of reliability and performance.</li>
<li>Max for Live will mean considerably more bushel baskets of cash showing up at Cycling74.  This bodes well for their continued existence as a company, and should make it possible for them to do even more cool stuff.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/05/15/perspective-on-cycling74-dropping-pluggo-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

