<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Do My Eyes Look Scary? &#187; w3c</title>
	<atom:link href="http://music.cornwarning.com/tag/w3c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://music.cornwarning.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fun for some value of fun: W3C HTML Validation</title>
		<link>http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/07/02/fun-for-some-value-of-fun-w3c-html-validation/</link>
		<comments>http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/07/02/fun-for-some-value-of-fun-w3c-html-validation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chaircrusher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3c]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://music.cornwarning.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So for &#8216;fun&#8217; I ran http://www.cornwarning.com/Tickertape through the W3C Markup Validator. Actually, the thing I was concerned about is that the page looked fucked up in IE8, and presumably other browsers. Haven&#8217;t rechecked it yet, since I&#8217;m on a Mac &#8230; <a href="http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/07/02/fun-for-some-value-of-fun-w3c-html-validation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="alignright"><g:plusone href="http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/07/02/fun-for-some-value-of-fun-w3c-html-validation/" size="standard" count="true"></g:plusone></div><p>So for &#8216;fun&#8217; I ran <a href="http://www.cornwarning.com/Tickertape">http://www.cornwarning.com/Tickertape</a> through the <a href="http://validator.w3.org/">W3C Markup Validator</a>.</p>
<p>Actually, the thing I was concerned about is that the page looked fucked up in IE8, and presumably other browsers. Haven&#8217;t rechecked it yet, since I&#8217;m on a Mac at work.  But at a minimum it found a bunch of small coding errors. No doubt I wouldn&#8217;t have had these problems if I&#8217;d been using an HTML editor more capable than emacs, but I haven&#8217;t yet found a WYSIWYG editor that&#8217;s free and doesn&#8217;t screw you somehow&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway I learned some stuff, like XHTML transitional wants &#8216;self contained&#8217; tags to self terminate, e.g. <strong>&lt;br&gt;</strong> should be <strong>&lt;br /&gt;</strong>, and attribute values should always be in quotes.  I&#8217;m not sure the permissive nature of web browsers&#8217; HTML parsers has done us any favors.</p>
<p>I also (DUH) am a big believer in standards compliance. Yeah I&#8217;m looking at you Microsoft.<br />
<img src="http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w274/willzweigart/the_more_you_know.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://music.cornwarning.com/2009/07/02/fun-for-some-value-of-fun-w3c-html-validation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

